Snowden also said that the "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" argument "doesn't make sense." He believe privacy is in fact the "fountainhead" of rights, from which other

The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private. Edward Snowden summed up the basic need for privacy quite well in a post on Reddit: “Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” Point 1: Everyone has things to hide, and that’s okay Feb 11, 2016 · Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.

Feb 11, 2016

Aug 29, 2018 Privacy vs “I have nothing to hide” - Kev Quirk Feb 21, 2019 Privacy Training | Nothing to Hide: Why Privacy Matters

Aug 02, 2013

Is There a Good Response to the “Nothing to Hide” Argument May 23, 2006 Why 'I Have Nothing to Hide' Is the Wrong Way to Think Many don’t understand why they should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to hide. It’s even less clear in the world of 'oblique' surveillance, given that apologists will "I have nothing to hide", Data Privacy in 2020 | Nelio